Cases 21 - 30 of 10,333
Cranmer v. Securus-J-Pay et al
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Cranmer
Defendant:
Securus-J-Pay, Potosi Correctional Center and Ms. Unknown Sansegraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 4:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Quintin Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. USA
as 4:2024cv00751
Petitioner:
Justin Clifford Allen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Long v. USA
as 4:2024cv00746
Petitioner:
Mario Long
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jeude v. Ste. Genevieve County Memorial Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County Memorial Hospital and Dr. Teena Sharrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Sheets et al
as 4:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Arlantis J. Gilmore
Defendant:
Charles Sheets, Geoffrey Ryan Rose, Ryan J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00750
Petitioner:
Maurice Hobson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Steele v. Falkenrath
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Robert H. Steele
Respondent:
Jeff Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Det. Unknown Watson, Arnold Police Dept. and Jefferson County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
