Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Chandler v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Destrya Lynn Chandler
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brannen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01429
Plaintiff:
Isebell Brannen , April Kowalsky , Donna Benedetto and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapple v. Chastain et al
as 4:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Chapple
Defendant:
Charles W. Chastain, Rosalie Shackelford, Shanta Pribble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. SLCRC et al
as 4:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Tatum
Defendant:
SLCRC, St. Mary's Honor Center, Norvella Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Mull et al
as 4:2012cv00561
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Turner
Defendant:
Unknown Mull, Angela Chandler, George Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 4:2012cv00001
Defendant:
Jennifer James, Unknown Bessey, Rosalee Shackleford and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helgoth et al v. Larkins et al
as 4:2009cv01880
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Helgoth and Maria Rubin
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, George Lombardi, Patricia Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faruq v. Larkins et al
as 4:2009cv00819
Plaintiff:
Khalifah Abd-Al Mubaymin Faruq
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, Joseph Hoffmeister, Larry Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Norris et al
as 4:2008cv01615
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Anderson
Defendant:
Robin Norris, Patricia Cornell, Sharon Garrious and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Wells et al
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Harrison
Defendant:
Jim Wells, Michael Starman, Curt Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
