Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Daniel Umpa
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SLWM LLC v. The Sourcing Group, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
SLWM LLC
Defendant:
The Sourcing Group, LLC, Kyle Smith, Rachelle Reeves and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanderson-Cole et al v. Coffman et al
as 4:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wayne Sanderson-Cole and Sanderson Family
Defendant:
Susan Coffman, Angela Nicole Kelly, Camille A. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
