Cases 61 - 70 of 13,026
Northern v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Northern
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collins v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Gary Collins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ellison v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Carl E Ellison
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 si Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Conn v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Bianca conn
Defendant:
Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region VII and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Edna Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle and Lisa Lee Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haik v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Marla Gay Haik
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Laramie v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Savannah Laramie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
