Cases 21 - 30 of 10,801
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Silva v. Rylander et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kate Rylander, Stacey Cooper, Linda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
O'Hara V v. Fairbank
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Leon O'Hara V
Defendant:
Richard Fairbank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Calhoun
as 6:2024cv03147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cortez Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pace v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. TMX Finance, LLC
as 4:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
TMX Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 4:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
