Cases 1 - 10 of 3,661
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sherman v. USA
as 8:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Terrence Sherman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Krumback v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv03100
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Alex Reyes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welch v. Deaver et al
as 4:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Paul Deaver, Cindy Bassett and Kale B. Burdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lammers v. County of Phelps, NE et al
as 8:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps, NE, Natalie Nelson, Shawn Eatherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Unit Administrator, CM Messner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00187
Petitioner:
Cornez Tucker
Defendant:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Stokey et al
as 4:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joshua Stokey and Kearney Police Dept,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sgt. Cabieles et al
as 8:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
David Carl Phelps
Defendant:
Sgt. Cabieles, Michael Meuller, Rob Jefferies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lammers v. County of Phelps NE et al
as 8:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps NE, Phelps County Corrections and Penny Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
