Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Barsony Holsters & Belts, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00210
Defendant:
Barsony Holsters & Belts, LLC and Smith and Wesson
Plaintiff:
Shane Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Novy et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
Angela Novy , Frederick Becker , Larry Collins and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaver et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00286
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Shaver , Bobby Casteel , Rickie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Rexon Industrial Corp., et al
as 8:2014cv00347
Defendant:
Power Tools Specialists, Inc. and Rexon Industrial Corp.
Plaintiff:
Duane Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pallett v. Thalken et al
as 8:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Pallett
Defendant:
Laurie Smith Camp and Thomas D. Thalken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pallett v. Smith Camp et al
as 8:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Pallett
Defendant:
Laurie Smith Camp and Thomas D. Thalken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2013cv05136
Plaintiff:
Ronnie W. Jones
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05102
Plaintiff:
Fred Cobb and Wanda Cobb
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Greenleaf of Arkansas, LLC and Tom Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
Tracey Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
