Cases 51 - 60 of 554
Booher v. Dale et al
as 5:2022cv06014
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Booher and Ronnie Wayne Booher, I
Defendant:
Douglas Dale, Andrew Callaway, Randy Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Halpern v. T-Mobile USA Inc ***Do not file in this case - All filings should be made in 4:21-md-3019.***
as 4:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Richard Halpern
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02592
Plaintiff:
Gordon Creager, Melissa Bagwell, Roderick Barris and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Frobenius et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
John Frobenius, Terry Germany, Ronald Gilchrist and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fourre v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02499
Plaintiff:
Richard Fourre
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Kimberly Ahrens, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kimberly Ahrens, Jerry Anguiano, Martin Cisneros and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
David Almendinger, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Gilbert v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
Richard Gilbert
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adams v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02067
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Campbell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01894
Plaintiff:
Donald Campbell, Dale Evinger, Michael Kinahan and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
