Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Kendricks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02837
Plaintiff:
Calanda Kendricks and Darryl Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02884
Plaintiff:
Christine Scott and Alfonza Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02542
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02540
Plaintiff:
Ralph Scott and Deborah Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Masters v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 0:2017cv01993
Plaintiff:
Scott Masters
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01874
Plaintiff:
Franklin Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2017cv01340
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington , Josephine Campbell , Jeffrey Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weisbrod et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Mark Weisbrod , Ernest Cole, II , Lawrence V. Cutts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Ellis Scott
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weisbrod et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Weisbrod , Ernest Cole, III , Lawrence V. Cutts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
