Civil Rights Cases filed in Iowa
Cases 91 - 100 of 456
Morrow v. City of Burlington, Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00186
Plaintiff: Dale Dexter Morrow, Jr.
Defendant: John Doe and City of Burlington, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. Naylor et al
as 4:2019cv00151
Defendant: John McGehee, Naylor, Dreyer and others
Plaintiff: Antonio Jose Cooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Whalen et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant: Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Douglas Bolton and others
Plaintiff: William Simpson Edwards
Interested Party: William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Peterson et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant: Adam Derr, John Hawk, Michelle Waddle and others
Plaintiff: Derrick Daniels
Interested Party: William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naholi v. Reade et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant: Robert Phelps, CJ Williams, Richard L Murphy and others
Plaintiff: Kevin Oscar Naholi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant: Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay v. Francis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant: John Doe, Stephanie Schmidt, Jane Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff: Michael Miles Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant: Kiley Begey, Henry W Latham, II, Davenport Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Edward A Campbell, Jr.
Interested Party: William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bender v. Loos, Jr et al
as 5:2019cv04003
Plaintiff: Noel Jermaine Bender
Defendant: John Loos, Jr and Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bender v. Loos, Jr et al
as 3:2019cv03001
Plaintiff: Noel Jermaine Bender
Defendant: John Loos, Jr and Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?