Cases 101 - 110 of 1,586
Robinson v. Carson et al
as 8:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Ryan Carson, John Marsh, Gerald Jorgensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Vision Electric et al
as 8:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Markus LaVelle Cleveland
Defendant:
Vision Electric, Mr. Maier and Samantha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Ballard
Defendant:
Taggert Boyd, Shane Thurman and Dr. Danial Danaher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maati v. Johnson et al
as 8:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Amikhet En Maati
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Lancaster County Dept. of Corr., Mr. Levitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey v. Overman
as 8:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Mark Overman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ringland v. Rossiter et al
as 8:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Chief Justice Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Senior Justice Joseph F. Bataillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Npimnee et al v. Andrews et al
as 8:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Hope Npimnee and Nebraska Prison Congress
Defendant:
Andrews, State of Nebraska, Taggart Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Rockman et al
as 8:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Johnathan Rockman, Rick Keller, Rod Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ringland v. Rossiter
as 8:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
