Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Reece et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03125
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reece, Joseph D. Thornblad, Shawn Curry-Rakesh and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suchan et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03114
Plaintiff:
Bryce Suchan, Matthew Reece, Joseph D Thornblad and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suchan et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03119
Plaintiff:
Bryce Suchan, Matthew Reece, Joseph D. Thornblad and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suchan et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Bryce Suchan, Matthew Reece, Joseph D. Thornblad and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suchan et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv03123
Plaintiff:
Bryce Suchan, Matthew Reece, Joseph D. Thornblad and others
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson and Lori Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Curry v. Dr. Christopher Posey, et al
as 12-3336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Ray Curry
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Christopher M. Posey, John Doe Medical Staff and Scott County Jail
Curry v. Posey et al
as 4:2012cv00381
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Curry
Defendant:
Christopher M. Posey, John Doe Medical Staff and Scott County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Curry v. John Doe, et al
as 12-2681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Ray Curry
Defendant - Appellee:
John Doe, 2nd Shift Intake Officer at the Scott County Jail on 7/17/10, Scott County Jail, Dennis Conard, Scott County Sheriff and others
Curry v. Scott County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Scott County et al
as 4:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Curry
Defendant:
Scott County, Scott County Sheriff's Department and Scott County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
