Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Henry Patterson v. Loretta Ryks, et al
as 11-2630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henry Laverne Patterson
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta Ryks, Lt. Officer, Greg Lindell, Lt. Officer, Steve Hammer, Assistant Warden MCF-STW and others
Hodgson v. Fabian et al
as 0:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Hodgson
Defendant:
Joan Fabian , John King , Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Ryks et al
as 0:2010cv04758
Plaintiff:
Henry Laverne Patterson
Defendant:
Loretta Ryks, Greg Lindell, Steve Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Maddox, III v. John King, et al
as 10-3177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry Maddox, III
Defendant - Appellee:
John King, Warden, Stillwater Prison, Minnesota, Michael Jonsson, Officer, Prison, Dora Hoffman, Officer, Prison and others
Duwenhoegger v. King et al
as 0:2010cv03965
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Duwenhoegger, Sr.
Defendant:
John King, Steve Hammer, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens v. Fabian et al
as 0:2010cv03823
Plaintiff:
Clarence James Dickens
Defendant:
Joan Fabian, John King, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fabian et al
as 0:2010cv02193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Smith
Defendant:
Joan Fabian, Eric Skon, Lynn Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton Baasi v. Joan Fabian, et al
as 10-1845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clayton Baasi
Defendant - Appellee:
Joan Fabian, David Crist, Sheryl Vesner and others
Haggins v. MN Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 0:2010cv01002
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Haywood Haggins
Defendant:
MN Commissioner of Corrections, John King, Michelle Smith and others
Harry Maddox, III v. John King, et al
as 10-1613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry Maddox, III
Defendant - Appellee:
John King, Warden, Stillwater Prison, Minnesota, Michael Jonsson, Officer, Prison, Dora Hoffman, Officer, Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
