Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Jackson v. Owen et al
as 4:2018cv00339
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
Sheryl Dahm and Adam Owen
Plaintiff:
Tonkeya Vaniece Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bragg v. Kracht et al
as 4:2018cv00264
Defendant:
John Hawk, Adam Benda, Chris Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Darvill Jimmy Joseph Bragg
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Wachtendorf et al
as 4:2018cv00260
Defendant:
Mark McGraw, Jeremy Engeman, Lenrenzo Riles and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell McGhee
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Woodbury County Jail
as 5:2018cv04040
Plaintiff:
Austin Beau Cummings, Trinity Thompson, Kenneth Marcus and others
Defendant:
Woodbury County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Turner et al
as 5:2018cv04039
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips and David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Dan Pingle, Adam Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blodgett v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Adam Gregg, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haire v. McKinney et al
as 4:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael Haire
Defendant:
Jim McKinney, Jeremy Pullem, Kate Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolz v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv03072
Plaintiff:
Adam Nolz
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Fort Dodge Correctional Facility, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. Healey et al
as 4:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Lockett, III
Defendant:
Adam Healey, Shane Woods, Scott Eschen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nibeck v. Marion Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Nibeck
Defendant:
Marion Police Department , Adam Cirkl , Donna Sue Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
