Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Stuart Day, et al v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc
as 15-1711
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stuart R. Day, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Robert Sweeten, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Deborah McElroy, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.
Michael Stenger, et al v. Bi-State Development Agency, et al
as 15-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Stenger, Tim Dempsey, Mike Little and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District, doing business as Metro
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 788
Stenger et al v. Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
as 4:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Michael Stenger , Tim Dempsey , Mike Little and others
Defendant:
Bi-State Development Agency of Missouri/Illinois Metropolitan District
Intervenor_defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union, Diviision 788
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
McGee v. Commonwealth Gaming & Holdings Corp. et al
as 4:2011cv04028
Defendant:
Kirby Muilenberg, Bryant Soberg, K.B.J. Gaming, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane McGee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hunter Levi v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, et al
as 08-3820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hunter R. Levi
Defendant - Appellee:
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., August Busch, Mark Bobak and others
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Woods Construction Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv01865
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Brandon Flinn, Raymond Linehan and others
Defendant:
Woods Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levi v. Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
Hunter R. Levi
Defendant:
Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc, August Busch, Mark Bobak and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
