Cases 1 - 10 of 15,798
Robinett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Yasmira Robinett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cobb v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Cobb
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Newberry v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01266
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Sandra Newberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vedder v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Justin Vedder
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martini v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Shaley Martini
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Grable v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
John Grable
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Beau Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sneed v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05074
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Sneed
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans Boyles v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03262
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Evelyn Evans Boyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marshall Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
