Disability Insurance Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,323
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: Douglas Anderson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Osmanovic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff: Merima Osmanovic
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Katie Rygmyr v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-2005
Plaintiff: Katie Rygmyr
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Rau v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Kayla Rau
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karen Littrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1923
Plaintiff: Karen D. Littrell
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Florence v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff: Matthew Florence
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Oster v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00557
Plaintiff: Cynthia Oster
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff: Tammy L. Spader
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party: Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff: Amber Onken
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?