Cases 181 - 190 of 13,001
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Andrews
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Baumgarden v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Deanna L. Baumgarden
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Deck v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Heather Dian Deck
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
In Re:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kellum v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Leah Kellum
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gebhard v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03348
Plaintiff:
Carrie Ann Gebhard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin-Vinerkar v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Mckenzie Martin-Vinerkar
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Houchin v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06153
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Houchin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Frapolli v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Katherine Frapolli
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Huskey v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
David William Huskey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hancock v. O'Malley
as 6:2023cv03370
Plaintiff:
Gayla Hancock
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
