Social Security Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Kosanke v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00362
Plaintiff: Karen S. Kosanke
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davidson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv05234
Plaintiff: Karen D. Davidson
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Saulat v. Saul
as 4:2019cv01001
Plaintiff: Karen Denise Saulat
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stout v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00286
Plaintiff: Karen S. Stout
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mauro-Mackey v. Social Security Administration Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02086
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff: Karen M. Mauro-Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valentine v. Saul
as 3:2019cv05048
Plaintiff: Karen Valentine
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Buckman v. Saul
as 4:2019cv00496
Defendant: Andrew M. Baum and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Karen Buckman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gaines v. Social Security Administration Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv05092
Plaintiff: Karen Gaines
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Dye v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00832
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Karen S. Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Reading v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00002
Plaintiff: Karen Reading
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?