Cases 11 - 20 of 78
United States v. Brandon Hayes, et al
as 21-2630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Brandon Lee Hayes
United States v. Charles Odom
as 21-2222
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Hayes Odom, also known as Red, also known as Charles Hardeman, also known as Clarence Turner, also known as Jermaine Hayes, also known as Charles Hayes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jeff Brown, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott McWhorter, Edward Young, Terrence Collins and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Obermiller Nelson Engineering, Inc. v. River Towers Association et al
as 0:2021cv00463
Defendant:
River Towers Association and Langston Pearson Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Hayes Automation, a Minnesota corporation
Plaintiff:
Obermiller Nelson Engineering, Inc.
Respondent:
Langston Pearson Enterprises, Inc. a Minnesota corporation doing business as Hayes Automation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3265
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Roger Maddux and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3240
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Jennifer Davidson, also known as Newman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roesevelt Hayes v. William Benton, et al
as 20-1952
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., CCS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roesevelt Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick Drummond, ARNP, Tucker Max Infirmary, William Benton, Health Services Administrator, Tucker Max Infirmary, Shaun Young, ARNP, Tucker Max Infirmary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
