Cases 21 - 30 of 807
United States v. Anthony Jackson, Jr.
as 24-1328
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Tyrone Jackson, Jr.
United States v. Deon Bailey
as 24-1280
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
United States v. Anthony Clay
as 24-1134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Dwayne Clay, also known as Oak
United States v. Anthony Collins
as 24-1099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Linard Collins
United States v. Anthony Unocic
as 24-1057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Unocic
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lockenvitz et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lockenvitz, John H. Lockenvitz, Sarah B. Lockenvitz and others
Counter Defendant:
Anthony Ceder
Defendant:
United States of America and Todd Van Housen
Counter Claimant:
Carlene Van Housen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
United States v. Anthony Red Elk
as 23-3775
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Red Elk
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
United States v. Prentiss Crumble
as 23-3601
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Prentiss Anthony Crumble
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
