Cases 31 - 40 of 962
Kenneth Dorn v. Gary Arnold, et al
as 21-3785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Dorn
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary M. Arnold, Judge, Arkansas Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court Justice, Lavenski R. Smith, Judge, 8th Circuit Court and others
Matthew Staszak v. John Yates
as 21-3742
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Staszak
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCC Forrest City
Dangelo Moore v. United States
as 21-3684
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dangelo P. Moore
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 21-3679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Frakes, (Current Director) - In thier Individual Capacity, Michelle Wilhelm, (Current Warden) - In their Individual Capacity, The State of Nebraska and others
John Harper v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-3649
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John P. Harper
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Andy Flores v. John Yates
as 21-3655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andy Flores
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden
Mark Stinson v. John Yates, et al
as 21-3365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Stinson
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCC Low, Blair, Camp Unit Manager, B.O.P., Randle, Lieutenant, B.O.P. and others
Okwuchukwu Jidoefor v. Louis Stephens, et al
as 21-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Okwuchukwu Jidoefor
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis Stephens, In his individual and official capacities, Curt Chapa, In his individual and official capacities, Lawrence Propes, In his individual and official capacities and others
Ricky Ashley v. Gary Arnold, et al
as 21-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricky Ashley
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary M. Arnold, Judge, Arkansas Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court Justice, Lavenski R. Smith, Judge, 8th Circuit Court and others
Harper v. DST
as 4:2021cv09069
Plaintiff:
John P. Harper
Defendant:
DST and DST Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
