Other Statutes Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00070
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mox et al v. Olson
as 0:2023cv03543
Plaintiff: Leda Mox and Armstrong Equine Massage Therapy, LLC
Defendant: Dennis Olson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 0:2021cv00548
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Plaintiff: Michael Armstrong
Armstrong v. Citibank, N.A.
as 0:2021cv00662
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Michael Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Armstrong v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 0:2021cv00645
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff: Michael Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Klein et al v. Armstrong
as 0:2020cv00442
Plaintiff: Ms. Taren Klein and State of Minnesota
Defendant: Mr. Curtis Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plymouth County Retirement System v. Patterson Companies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv00871
Defendant: Ann B. Gugino, Patterson Companies, Inc., Scott P. Anderson and others
Plaintiff: Plymouth County Retirement System
Petitioner: Employees Retirement System of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Pembroke Pines Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers, Central Laborers Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv03715
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2010cv00091
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Larry Darnell Armstrong

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?