Cases 1 - 10 of 130
United States v. Nichole Forde
as 24-1353
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nichole Marie Forde
Moon v. Sam Scism Motors et al
as 4:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Sam Scism Motors doing business as Sam Scism Ford and Unknown Traveling Black Salesman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ford v. Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
as 3:2023cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ford
Defendant:
Glutality Provider Group, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ford v. Farha Roofing, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Brianna Ford
Defendant:
Farha Roofing, LLC and Farha Roofing KC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Samuel Ford
as 23-1176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel B. Ford
Roderick Ford v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., et al
as 22-3232
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Klein, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Roderick Ford
Defendant / Appellant:
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD Ameritrade, Inc. and Frederic J. Tomczyk
Roderick Ford v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., et al
as 22-8016
Not Classified By Court:
Gerald J. Klein, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
Respondent:
Roderick Ford
Petitioner:
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD Ameritrade, Inc. and Frederic J. Tomczyk
Damien Ford v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2258
Petitioner:
Damien Ford
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Damien Ford v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1802
Petitioner:
Damien Ford
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Roderick Ford v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., et al
as 21-3991
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Klein, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Roderick Ford
Defendant / Appellant:
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD Ameritrade, Inc. and Frederic J. Tomczyk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
