Cases 1 - 10 of 64
BNSF Railway Company v. Beaulieu et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Pierson Beaulieu, Dustin Boyd, Wendy Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
United States v. Edward Harrison
as 22-3347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Green Harrison
Moore v. Valette et al
as 0:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Calla Moore
Defendant:
Jean-Michel Valette, Shelly Ibach, Barbara Matas and others
United States v. Robert Harrison
as 22-1537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert E. Harrison
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Jane Doe v. Lisa Worrell
as 21-2335
Defendant / Appellant:
Lisa Worrell, Individually
Defendant:
The Estate of Joshua Q. Eckerson, Individually and Harrison County
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jane Doe
United States v. Gregory Harrison
as 21-1962
Defendant / Appellant:
Gregory Harrison
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
