Cases 1 - 10 of 15
NLRB v. Home Depot U.S.A.
as 24-1513
Respondent:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Home Depot U.S.A. v. NLRB
as 24-1406
Petitioner:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jeff Hale, et al v. Emerson Electric Company
as 22-8005
Petitioner:
Jeff Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Raymond Gray, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Andrew Bowers and others
Respondent:
Emerson Electric Company
Not Classified By Court:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Company and The Home Depot, Inc.
Waters v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02467
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Komoroski v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ivan Komoroski
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffrey Hartman v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2014cv01545
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hartman
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Hildebrand et al v. Black & Decker Corporation et al
as 4:2010mc00267
Movant:
Emerson Tool Company
Plaintiff:
Steven Hildebrand, James Miles, Mauricio Mina and others
Defendant:
The Black & Decker Corporation, Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc., Dewalt Industrial Tool Co. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
