Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant:
1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.87 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Sara Stahlschmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.22 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01372
Defendant:
0.97 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, West Alton, City of, Williams Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01367
Defendant:
2.54 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.47 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01368
Defendant:
0.38 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Carol J. Connoyer, Eugene E. Beckham & Janet L. Beckham Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 4.70 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01356
Defendant:
Central Bank of St. Louis, 2.58 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of Portage des Sioux and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.22 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01350
Defendant:
1.56 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.24 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01359
Defendant:
Shell Pipe Line Corporation, Williams Communications, Inc., Wood River Pipeline Company and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01360
Defendant:
1.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Michael Stanley Mintert as Trustee of the Michael Stanley Mintert Trust Dated January 10, 2003, 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.31 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, et al
as 4:2018cv01327
Defendant:
2.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, GULF CENTRAL PIPELINE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SPIRE STL PIPELINE LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.28 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Capital Commerce Mortgage Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Gulf Pacific Rice Co., Inc. et al v. Bayer Cropscience, LP et al
as 4:2008cv01545
Plaintiff:
Gulf Pacific Rice Co., Inc., Gulf Rice Milling, Inc. and Harvest Rice, Inc.
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, LP, Bayer CropScience, Inc., Bayer Cropscience Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
