Cases 121 - 130 of 20,991
Seales-Supalus v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00983
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Missouri
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales-Supalus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. D'Agrosa et al
as 4:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Taras Jermaine Wallace
Defendant:
Paul Joseph D'Agrosa, Levell Littleton, Jennings and St. Louis Missouri Office Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sousley v. Buckner
as 5:2024cv06091
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Petitioner:
Joseph Sousley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Yrigollen et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Kyle Yrigollen, Warden (2010-2012), Warden (2010) and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. USA
as 3:2024cv05057
Petitioner:
Leng Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bradley v. State of Missouri
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
John Bradley
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. USA
as 4:2024cv00978
Petitioner:
Kurt Wallace
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caradine v. St. Louis County Courts et al
as 4:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney's Office, St. Louis County Courts, Amanda McNelley and others
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Caradine, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Defendant:
CO 1 Unknown Riley, Sgt. Unknown Heth, Andrew Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Harmison et al
as 6:2024cv03215
Defendant:
Jerry Harmison and Nicholas Bergeon
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
