Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Rios-Rosa v. Financial Office of JCC et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Financial Office of JCC and Financial Office at WMCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Rios-Rosa v. SECC Financial Office Members
as 23-1834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Southeast Correctional Center, Financial Office Members
Rios-Rosa v. Soper et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Jason Soper, Ronald Hollyday, Pamela Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios-Rosa v. SECC Financial Office Members
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
SECC Financial Office Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios-Rosa v. Stange
as 5:2023cv06024
Petitioner:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel Rios-Rosa v. Bill Stange, et al
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Bill Stange, Charles Reed, Case Manager and Molly Lieja, Supervisor of Nurses
Rios-Rosa v. Hills et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Nina Hills and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios-Rosa v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios-Rosa v. Limbaugh et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. and Gregory J. Linhares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Rios-Rosa v. John Christenson, et al
as 22-3476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant / Appellee:
John Christenson and Donald Phillips
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
