Cases 21 - 30 of 1,255
Abdikarim v. Kahl et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Investigator Logan Kahl, Unknown Officers, Chief David Zibolski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kisi v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Jean-Michael Kisi
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdikarim v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Jesse Jahner, C. Olson, Fargo Cass Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Guyton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Lacey Bernard Guyton, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Poitra v. USA
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Adam Jason Poitra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Abdikarim v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Chief of Police Fargo, ND, Chief of Police West Fargo, ND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torkelsen v. Braun
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Defendant:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
