Cases 31 - 40 of 256
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Respondent:
Tracey Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimer v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Mark Latimer
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
William Cleveland Alan Boykin
Respondent:
Jessie Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Williams
as 0:2022cv03195
Petitioner:
Demetrius Demarco Spencer
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Odneal v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03107
Plaintiff:
Shawn K. Odneal
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Guy Bosch, Marrisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McInnis v. Bolin
as 0:2022cv03064
Plaintiff:
Jquan Leearthur McInnis
Defendant:
Warden William Bolin and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faul v. Lejeune
as 0:2022cv02993
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Michel Lejeune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bakambia v. Craane et al
as 0:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, Tim Walz, Luke Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
