Cases 41 - 50 of 195
Malloy v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Branden Joseph Malloy
Defendant:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01361
Plaintiff:
Phillip Buchanan
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc., Bryon Farmer, Angela Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husain v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01364
Petitioner:
Dawud Ameen Husain
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manzella v. Heather H. Turner et al
as 4:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Manzella
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Centurion Medical Services, Heather H. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01184
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
David Vandergriff and Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01155
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01124
Petitioner:
Maurice Hoskins
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rich v. Archibeque et al
as 4:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
William Lee Rich
Defendant:
Adam Bradley Archibeque and Marshall Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Buchanan County Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
Valdez McDonald
Defendant:
Buchanan County Police Department, Patrick Robb, Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. McNutt et al
as 4:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Vinson Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kent McNutt, Dr. Jerry Lovelace, Angela Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
