Cases 1 - 10 of 789
Dailey v. USA
as 6:2024cv03162
Petitioner:
Derrick E. Dailey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Murphy v. USA
as 6:2024cv03163
Petitioner:
Antonieo E. Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dunham v. Advance Correctional Health et al
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
David E Dunham
Defendant:
Advance Correctional Health, Ashley Williams Weis, Robert Busetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Glatczak et al
as 4:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Wallace, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig A. Glatczak, Caleb Thompson and Andrew Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald E. Phillips, Brian George, Michael L. Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Dorothy E. Mays
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Adam A. Field and Gabriel E. Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windeknecht v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
Mr. Christopher Bullock, Chief of St. Francois Police Dept., Mr. Michael Blake Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
