Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Dietz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Larry B. Dietz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Buckner
as 1:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Will Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jendro v. Buckner
as 3:2024cv05020
Petitioner:
Jeffrey D Jendro
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marron v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Vicente Roldan Marron
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. Campbell
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Florissant Police Department, Patrick ONeill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amlin v. Buckner
as 6:2024cv03051
Petitioner:
Qwenten D Amlin
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Potter
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
