Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wruck v. Wengler
as 0:2009cv01973
Petitioner:
Philip Wruck
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Calhoun v. Wengler et al
as 0:2009cv00683
Plaintiff:
Abdul Khalif Calhoun
Defendant:
Timothy Wengler, Seidl, Koosman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Said Moussa Gouleed v. Timothy Wengler
as 09-1256
Petitioner - Appellant:
Said Moussa Gouleed
Respondent - Appellee:
Timothy Wengler
Joseph Stanley Pigott v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 09-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Stanley Pigott
Defendant - Appellee:
Corrections Corporation of America, Timothy Wengler, Warden, G. Andrews, Officer at Corrections Corporation of America and others
Herbert Louis Carter, Jr. v. Timothy Wengler
as 09-1180
Petitioner - Appellant:
Herbert Louis Carter, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Timothy Wengler
Carter v. Wengler
as 0:2008cv05837
Petitioner:
Herbert Louis Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DelVecchio v. Wengler
as 0:2008cv02220
Petitioner:
Alan Lee DelVecchio
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler and Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Wengler
as 0:2008cv01113
Petitioner:
Eric Smith
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. C.C.A./Prairie Correctional Faility et al
as 0:2008cv00880
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ellis
Defendant:
C.C.A./Prairie Correctional Faility, Swenson, Wengler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gouleed v. Wengler
as 0:2007cv04152
Petitioner:
Said Moussa Gouleed
Respondent:
Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
