Cases 31 - 40 of 574
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. T and M Excavating, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
T and M Excavating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and Welfare Fund v. Northwestern Fruit Company
as 0:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Joint Council 32 - Employers Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Northwestern Fruit Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Aztec Construction Specialties, LLC
as 4:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Aztec Construction Specialties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
George et al v. USAFRIK, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Jason George, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Timothy Gillen, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Jason George and others
Defendant:
USAFrick Inc, Richard Anthony Mongo and USAFRIK, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
George, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund et al
as 0:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jason George, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Timothy Gillen, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Jason George and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Retirement Trust and the Trustees Thereof et al v. RH Mullen, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Retirement Trust and the Trustees Thereof, Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Health and Welfare Fund and the Trustees Thereof and Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Education Fund and the Trustees Thereof
Defendant:
RH Mullen, Inc., Mullen Company, LLC and The R.H. Mullen Corporation doing business as RH Mullen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smith et al v. Highland Community College et al
as 4:2023mc00218
Plaintiff:
B.J. Smith, Bradford Zinn and Jered Ross
Defendant:
Highland Community College, Board of Trustees for HCC, Russell Karn and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Smith et al v. Highland Community College et al
as 4:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
B.J. Smith, Bradford Zinn and Jered Ross
Defendant:
Highland Community College, Board of Trustees for HCC, Russell Karn and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council et al v. Presleys Glass, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis, Board of Trustees of the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Presleys Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council et al v. Henry Gasser Construction Company
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council, Carpenters Pension Fund of Greater St. Louis, Board of Trustees of the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Henry Gasser Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
