Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sexton v. Soo Line Railroad Company et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
John Sexton
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway doing business as dba CP Rail System, a Minnesota Corporation and Dakota Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp. doing business as dba Canadian Pacific, a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 rs Fed. Question: Federal Rail Safety Act
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Scott Washington et al
as 6:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Susie Scott Washington , Cynthia Scott, Todd Micou and others
Cross_claimant:
Susie Scott Washington
Cross_defendant:
Annie Hudson, Todd Micou, Cynthia Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Kringle et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Laura Kringle, Ronald Koeperich, Robert Koerperich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Caradine et al
as 6:2013cv02068
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Andrea Caradine, Marina Caradine, JaLessa Caradine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. High Tech Electric et al
as 5:2012cv04109
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund , Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Savings & Retirement Plan and Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Vacation & Holiday Plan
Defendant:
High Tech Electric, LLC, Pottebaum's Service Electric, LLC and Michael Pottebaum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Malloy et al
as 4:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Deanna Malloy, Christine Schreck and Donna Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
