Cases 161 - 170 of 1,972
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04085
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04095
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Hernandez
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waddon v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04084
Plaintiff:
Gillet Waddon
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Follis v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04087
Plaintiff:
Levi Follis
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04086
Plaintiff:
Scott Mills
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04082
Plaintiff:
Joshua McCollum
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunn v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bunn
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Armstrong
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04078
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hale
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04079
Plaintiff:
Braeden West
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
