Cases 171 - 180 of 16,180
Lapteva v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Elena Stanislavovn Lapteva
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neemann v. USA
as 8:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Gregory Neemann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCray v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2024cv03040
Petitioner:
Colby I. McCray
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trampe v. Hy-Vee, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Shawn Trampe and Shawn A. Trampe
Defendant:
Hy-Vee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Syed v. USA
as 8:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Hammaduzzaman Syed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hatcher v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Joush Hatcher, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Choy v. Choy et al
as 8:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Matthew Choy
Defendant:
Barbara Choy and Michael Coy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choy v. Barzee
as 8:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Matthew Choy
Defendant:
William Barzee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
