Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Garner v. Barton et al
as 4:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Dian Garner
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
May v. Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00166
Defendant:
Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Plaintiff:
Donna May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCarty et al v. Barton et al
as 4:2013cv02562
Plaintiff:
Charles McCarty and Cathy McCarty
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moss v. Barton et al
as 4:2013cv02535
Plaintiff:
Gail Moss
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mueller v. Barton et al.
as 4:2013cv02523
Plaintiff:
Lois Mueller
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. , Roger Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Matt et al v. Barton et al
as 4:2013cv02529
Plaintiff:
Julie Matt and Andrew Matt
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lavear v. Barton et al.
as 4:2013cv02524
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lavear
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hageman v. Barton et al
as 4:2013cv02522
Plaintiff:
Greg Hageman
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. Barton et al
as 4:2013cv02516
Plaintiff:
Sophornia Harris
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barton, III, Consumer Adjustment Company, Inc. and Roger Weiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.