Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Krayneski, et al v. Crown Cork & Seal Co, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:1996cv03336
Defendant:
A.P. Green Industries, Inc., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Krayneski and Stanley J. Krayneski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sorensen, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00327
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sorensen and Dale R. Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rowse, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00325
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Rowse and Lois B. Rowse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Nielsen, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00317
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Nielsen and Loren L. Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Blaufuss, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00318
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Fred C. Blaufuss and Margaret Blaufuss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Vanourny, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00321
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Naneye Vanourny and Stanley D. Vanourny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rhedin v. GAF Corporation, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1988cv00924
Defendant:
A C & S Inc., A.P. Green Refractories, A.W. Chesterton and others
Plaintiff:
Roland E. Rhedin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ludwick, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00320
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Allen K. Ludwick and Norma M. Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Herbst, et al v. Armstrong World Ind, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:1992cv00316
Defendant:
Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Certainteed Products Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry A. Herbst and Marilyn Herbst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Box et al v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Defendant:
Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Box, Kermit Francis and Keith Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.