Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Hopkins v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00994
Petitioner:
Rickey Lee Hopkins
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
Evalyne Kathleen Hancock
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DeWeese v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Chris DeWeese
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisden v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Quincy Baisden
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watie v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Demeyon Watie
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Terrell Reed
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Thomas May
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conn v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Dallas Conn
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
