Cases 21 - 30 of 3,235
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Amber Onken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vojchehoske v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Steven Vojchehoske
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rau v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kayla Rau
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lomax v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darius Lomax
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Karie F. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mount v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Tyson S Mount
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Karen Littrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Littrell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Good v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mark Good
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kienast v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kienast
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christina Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
