Cases 21 - 30 of 399
Traylor v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Raymond Joseph Traylor, Sr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Packard v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Lisa Packard
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dupaul et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUPAUL and LISA DUPAUL
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc., 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lenhart et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lenhart and Lisa Lenhart
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodard v. Stensteh
as 0:2023cv03588
Petitioner:
James Andre Woodard
Respondent:
Lisa Stensteh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferron v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ferron
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bell v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03881
Petitioner:
Dequarn Markeyth Bell
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robideau v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03402
Petitioner:
Raymond Clyde Robideau
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown Munsick v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown Munsick
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
