Cases 21 - 30 of 834
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Administrative District Council of Eastern Missouri et al v. Riley Flooring and Cabinets, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Administrative District Council of Eastern Missouri and Bricklayers Local Union No. 1 of Missouri
Defendant:
Riley Flooring and Cabinets, LLC, Michele Riley and Robert Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Boykins
as 4:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Luther Boykins doing business as Luther Supply Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Dura-Seal and Strike, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Dura-Seal and Strike, Inc. doing business as Dura-Seal Paving
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MO-KAN Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Parrish & Sons Construction, LLC
as 4:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
MO-KAN Teamsters Pension Fund, MO-KAN Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund, Teamsters Local Union No. 541 Vacation-Holiday Fund and others
Defendant:
Parrish & Sons Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BAC Local Union 15 Welfare Fund et al v. A.K. Lee Construction, LLC
as 4:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
BAC Local Union 15 Welfare Fund, BAC Local Union 15 Pension Fund, BAC Local Union 15 Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
A.K. Lee Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. St. Charles County Piping, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
St. Charles County Piping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. CJ Hamilton, LLC
as 4:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
CJ Hamilton, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Laclede Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 53
as 6:2022cv03227
Plaintiff:
Laclede Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 53
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
MO-KAN Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Wilson's Trucking, LLC
as 4:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
MO-KAN Teamsters Pension Fund, MO-KAN Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, Teamsters Local Union No. 541 Vacation-Holiday Fund and others
Defendant:
Wilson's Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Gleeson Asphalt, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Gleeson Asphalt, Inc. and Catherine Rose doing business as Gleeson Asphalt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
