Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Saint Paul Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, The et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 0:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Saint Paul Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, The, Community Stabilization Project, Aurora/Saint Anthony Neighborhood Development Corporation and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, United States Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council, The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Type:
Civil Rights
Tonkin v. Jim Moran & Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00771
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Tonkin and Kenneth G. Tonkin
Defendant:
Jim Moran & Associates, Inc. and Jim Moran & Associates, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Jim Moran & Associates, Inc. and Jim Moran & Associates, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Kenneth G. Tonkin and Kenneth G. Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Moran et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Moran, Daniel Moran, Daniel Moran and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Moran v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv01888
Plaintiff:
Mildred Nora Moran
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Moran v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00581
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Moran
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
