Cases 31 - 40 of 373
Perez v. Target Corporation et al
as 0:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Rafael E. Perez
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Brian C. Cornell, Michael J. Fiddelke and others
Petitioner:
Terry and Diane Van Der Tuuk Living Trust, Gary Schaedel, Brian Howard and others
Kahn v. Target Corporation
as 0:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Yoram Kahn
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hilo Products, Inc. v. Target Corporation
as 0:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Hilo Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Target Corporation, John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20 and others
Petitioner:
Michael Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Copeland et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2022cv03174
Plaintiff:
Patricia Copeland and Steven Copeland
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Assa Abloy Entrance Systems US, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Stanley Access Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation
as 22-3468
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert B. Leflar
Defendant / Appellant:
Target Corporation
Target Corporation v. Robert Leflar
as 22-8018
Petitioner:
Target Corporation
Respondent:
Robert B. Leflar
Kristen Cooley v. Target Corporation, et al
as 22-3251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kristen N. Cooley, guardian of the estate of N.O.C., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
Target Corporation, Target Enterprise, Inc. and John Does, 1-10
Klise v. Target Corporation
as 4:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Klise
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crawford et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 0:2022cv02422
Plaintiff:
Candice Crawford and P.C.
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Walmart, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Feiler et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv02379
Plaintiff:
Krysanthemum Feiler and F.C.
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Target Corporation and Walmart, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.