Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Gruseth v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv04050
Plaintiff:
Sandra F. Gruseth
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Calvillo et al v. Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv04033
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Calvillo , Nathan Calvillo , Joleen F. Delutri and others
Defendant:
Siouxland Urology Associates P.C. , Siouxland Urology Center, L.L.C. , John A. Wolpert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smice v. Hollingsworth
as 4:2011cv04031
Petitioner:
Robert F. Smice
Respondent:
J. Hollingsworth and Tim Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rainford v. Cole et al
as 4:2011cv04029
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rainford
Defendant:
Dr. James F. Cole and Great Plains Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munro v. Owen et al
as 1:2011cv01004
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Donald Munro, III
Defendant:
Vincent Owen, Cheryl Joy Renelt, Kay F. Nikolas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forsman v. Reisch et al
as 3:2010cv03023
Plaintiff:
Connie F. Forsman
Defendant:
Tim Reisch, Duane Russell, Brenda Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
I.S.B. et al v. State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration et al
as 4:2010cv04142
Plaintiff:
I.S.B., Willie Reed, IV, Thanh Quang Ngo and others
Defendant:
State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration, South Dakota Department of Revenue & Regulations, South Dakota Bureau of Personell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Hankins et al
as 5:2010cv05062
Plaintiff:
United States of America and South Dakota, State of
Defendant:
Ruth E Hankins and Patricia F Repke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Welch v. Ligtenberg et al
as 4:2010cv04075
Plaintiff:
Robert L Welch
Defendant:
Ligtenberg, Dennis Kaemingk, James P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winegard et al v. Davis
as 4:2010cv04040
Plaintiff:
Evan Winegard and Rene M. Martinez
Defendant:
Vernon F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
