Cases 41 - 50 of 350,682
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Watkins v. USA
as 0:2024cv02218
Petitioner:
Deon Cameron Watkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Garcia v. USA
as 0:2024cv02219
Petitioner:
Joel Llamas Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan, Conor R West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Torgerson et al
as 0:2024cv02188
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Adam Torgerson and Shannon Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walton v. Faribault Correctional
as 0:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Michael Walton
Defendant:
Faribault Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dongari v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Soujanya Dongari
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Laverty v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Everett Laverty
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
James v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 0:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Veda James
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Consiglio v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
James Consiglio
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
