Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00048
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hussein v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 0:2008cv00023
Petitioner:
Rukia Abdi Hussein
Respondent:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
United States v. David Santana-Aguirre
as 07-3706
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
David Santana-Aguirre
Ginters et al v. Frazier et al
as 0:2007cv04681
Plaintiff:
Viktors Ginters, Viktors Ginters, Rochelle Ginters and others
Defendant:
Denise Frazier, Eduardo Aguirre, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Aguirre-Raya v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00289
Petitioner:
Jose Aguirre-Raya
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nagy v. Tsang et al
as 0:2007cv02282
Petitioner:
Arpad Nagy, Arpad Nagy and Arpad Nagy
Respondent:
Chi Tsang, Denise Frazier, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farbakhsh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 0:2007cv01714
Plaintiff:
Kambiz Farbakhsh
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
